Breaking News & Updates

ICOES accreditation: credibility or cash grab?

When an email lands in your inbox promising to make your online courses more “credible” — for a fee — it’s worth asking: who exactly is doing the accrediting, and what are you actually paying for?

We’ve been there. And if you run an online training business, chances are you have too.

The Email That Inspired This Article

We recently reviewed a cold outreach from an organisation called ICOES — the International Council for Online Educational Standards. Their pitch was polished and professional:

• “Accreditation gives your training centre added credibility in a competitive market.”
• “It highlights your commitment to educational excellence.”
• “It boosts learner confidence.”

The pricing? €375/year for 1–2 courses. Up to €995/year for full centre accreditation. Plus an optional certificate reselling model where students pay up to €49.99 for a hard copy certificate — and ICOES pockets the difference.

It’s a compelling pitch. But it’s also a model we’ve seen before.

Déjà Vu: The ICB Experience

EzyLearn was an accredited training provider with the Institute of Certified Bookkeepers (ICB) for six years. We paid $1,200 a year for the privilege, genuinely believing it would benefit our students and give aspiring BAS agents a foot in the door with an industry body.

Here’s what actually happened: in six years, our courses were never once evaluated, assessed, or reviewed by the ICB.

Not once.

• Students rarely joined the ICB after completing our courses
• The ICB referred very little traffic to our website
• Our course quality didn’t improve because of the relationship — we were already doing that ourselves

When we eventually walked away from the ICB partnership, our course content didn’t slip. In fact, it got better — because we were never relying on an external badge to maintain standards. We were doing it ourselves.

You can read the full story in our earlier article on national accreditation.

So What Does ICOES Actually Do?

To be fair, ICOES is upfront: they say they don’t deliver courses themselves. They review what you already deliver and give you a certificate and a feedback report. That’s something.

But let’s look at the model more closely:

• The annual fee funds a “quality review” — but what are the benchmarks? Who are the reviewers? What happens if you fail?
• The certificate reselling model is essentially a revenue share where ICOES sets the student pricing and takes a cut
• Accreditation lasts just one year — so it’s a recurring revenue stream, not a one-time quality stamp

That’s not accreditation in any meaningful governmental or regulatory sense. It’s a membership with a badge.

What Real Accreditation Looks Like in Australia

In Australia, genuine national accreditation means something specific. Training courses that lead to a profession — like a Certificate IV in Financial Services — are regulated, audited, and delivered only by Registered Training Organisations (RTOs).

RTOs comply with government standards. They’re assessed regularly. There are real consequences for non-compliance.

There is no nationally accredited training course for Xero, MYOB, QuickBooks, or any other accounting software. There isn’t one for Adobe Photoshop or Microsoft Office, either. Software skills are skills — not professions. The government doesn’t accredit them, and no private body can replicate what the government framework provides.

The Real Question: Does Accreditation Make a Course Better?

The short answer is: not necessarily.

The ICB never reviewed our courses. ICOES offers a “full quality review” — but it’s a one-time annual process with no ongoing oversight. Neither model creates continuous improvement. That comes from the course provider.

The people best placed to assess the quality of a bookkeeping course are practising bookkeepers, BAS agents, and accountants. That’s who EzyLearn asks. When a registered BAS agent tells us our Xero training prepares students for real-world client work, that means more than any annual certificate from an offshore accreditation body.

What Should You Look For Instead?

If you’re a student evaluating a course, here are better quality signals than a logo from an organisation you’ve never heard of:

• Verified student reviews from people who’ve used the skills in real work
• Practitioner endorsement — are working professionals recommending it?
• Regular course updates — does the content reflect current software versions?
• Transparent course structure — do you know what you’re getting before you pay?
• CPD recognition — for BAS agents, does the Tax Practitioners Board recognise the training?

A badge from ICOES or ICB doesn’t answer any of those questions.

The Bottom Line

ICOES and ICB are very different organisations — one is an international online body, the other is a legitimate Australian industry association with genuine membership benefits. But their accreditation models share a structural similarity: course providers pay an annual fee, courses may or may not be meaningfully reviewed, and the primary beneficiary of the “credibility” arrangement is the accrediting body itself.

Quality isn’t a certificate. It’s what your students can do after they finish.

At EzyLearn, we’d rather invest in better course content, more video modules, and ongoing student support than pay for a badge that a hiring manager in Parramatta has never heard of.

If you’re curious about what genuine, practitioner-endorsed online training looks like — explore our Xero, MYOB and Microsoft Office courses here.

Have you been approached by an accreditation body promising to boost your credibility? We’d love to hear your experience.

-- Did you like what you read? Want to receive these posts via email when they are published? Subscribe below.